Roopya Credit risk model validation ensures that credit risk models operate within established parameters and accurately predict the probability of default (PD), exposure at default (EAD), and loss given default (LGD). This involves a rigorous assessment of the model's conceptual soundness, including its theoretical underpinnings and the appropriateness of its statistical and mathematical methodologies. Validation activities include back-testing against historical data, benchmarking against external models or industry standards, and stress testing to evaluate performance under extreme but plausible scenarios. The process also examines the model's data integrity, parameter estimation, and the stability of its predictions over time. Through these mechanisms, credit risk model validation seeks to identify potential weaknesses or biases in the model, ensuring that it complies with regulatory standards and effectively supports risk management strategies.
SCHEDULE A DEMORoopya credit risk model validation purpose:
Approach | Methodology | Focus Areas | Technical Considerations |
Statistical Analysis |
- Linear and logistic regression analysis - Time series analysis - Survival analysis |
- Probability of Default (PD) - Loss Given Default (LGD) - Exposure at Default (EAD) |
- Assess model fit (e.g., R-squared, AIC) - Evaluate predictive power (e.g., ROC curves, AUC) - Test for statistical significance of predictors |
Back-testing | - Comparison of predicted outcomes vs. actual outcomes over a historical period | - Model performance - Forecast accuracy |
- Use of historical loan performance data - Analysis of model prediction errors - Adjustment for overfitting and underfitting |
Benchmarking | - Comparing model outputs with those from alternative models or industry standards | - Model competitiveness - Model robustness |
- Selection of appropriate benchmarks - Analysis of discrepancies and their sources - Consideration of external factors affecting performance |
Stress Testing | - Scenario analysis - Sensitivity analysis |
- Model resilience under adverse conditions | - Design of stress scenarios (e.g., economic downturns) - Evaluation of model outputs under stressed conditions - Analysis of model behaviour and parameter stability |
Sensitivity Analysis | - Perturbation of input variables and parameters | - Model stability - Parameter impact |
- Identification of key drivers of model output - Quantification of changes in output due to variations in inputs - Assessment of parameter estimation methods |
Data Quality Assessment | - Data integrity checks - Data completeness and accuracy verification |
- Input data quality - Appropriateness for model purposes |
- Analysis of missing values and outliers - Verification of data sources and collection methods - Assessment of data preprocessing and feature engineering techniques |
Model Calibration | - Adjusting model parameters based on current and historical data | - Model accuracy - Parameter relevance |
- Techniques for parameter estimation (e.g., Maximum Likelihood Estimation, Bayesian approaches) - Evaluation of calibration effectiveness |
Regulatory Compliance Check | - Review against regulatory guidelines and requirements | - Compliance with regulatory standard - Model governance and documentation |
- Documentation of model development and validation processes - Evidence of compliance with Basel III/IV, IFRS 9, etc - Review of model risk management practices |
Model Use and Decision Impact | - Analysis of model integration into business processes | - Decision-making process - Risk management strategy |
- Assessment of model alignment with risk appetite - Evaluation of model's impact on lending decisions - Review of model's operational efficiency |
While the requirements vary slightly across jurisdictions and regulatory bodies, Roopya generally encompass the following regulatory aspects: